Sunday, November 15, 2009
innocent until proven muslim
shorter gary welsh: when a muslim shoots people, it's terrorism. when a white christian tries to shoot someone, it's understandable. ¶
skip to main |
skip to sidebar
background
click to change it
background 1
background 2
background 3
background 4
background 5
solid black
solid white
background 1
background 2
background 3
background 4
background 5
solid black
solid white
latest pix
now listening
10 comments:
what do you think when a muslim kills someone while shouting out God's name and praises while doing it?
Just curious.
as usual, you completely miss the point.
I got the point when patriots with Ron Paul bumper stickers and U.S. Constitution defenders were targeted as possible terrorists by the Missouri state troopers.
I got the point.
Unfortunately, you are so lockstep and blinded you rarely get it.
How's Obama's promises panning out for you? How are you liking that no higher than 8% post-stimulus unemployment?
http://www.wnd.com/index.php?fa=PAGE.view&pageId=116259
That's how Muslims feel about women and Christians...intolerance for either.
so it's bad to assume ron paul devotees are terrorists, but okay to assume muslims are terrorists?
nice double standard you've got there.
That's how Muslims feel about women and Christians...intolerance for either.
have you ever read the bible? you won't find a lot of tolerance for women or nonchristians in it.
And regarding Christianity...while they certainly have their problems they do seem to have cleaned up their act in regard to violence (no more inquisitions) and treatment of women.
The Muslims are still living in the 15th Century; they practice and rigidly enforce inhumane traditions designed to push down the power of the individual in a very forced submission.
Forced submission is immoral. Submission by consent is not.
Christians no longer promote these practices.
And THAT is the difference.
since you're incapable of getting the point, i'll state it plainly:
when a muslim is accused of something, you and gary immediately assume the worst, without waiting for the facts to come in. (remember, when gary wrote his first post about hasan, the media was reporting that hasan had been killed.)
but when a christian is accused of something, you give him the benefit of the doubt.
gary, being a defense lawyer, should know better.
the fact that you don't see anything wrong with this double standard says it all, really.
The American Taliban:
http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/26315908/#34004795
I don't give Christians the benefit of the doubt. In fact I've been quite vocal in my outrages at their hypocrisy when I see it.
However, lately I'm not seeing violence from Christians. Are you?
The facts came in immediately. A Muslim was shouting praises to Allah as he murdered innocent people at an army base.
If that's not terrorism, I don't know what is.
On the other hand, I noticed that you did not defend the christians sporting patriotic bumper stickers from being labeled terrorists, yet they didn't shoot up a bunch of people.
The facts came in immediately. A Muslim was shouting praises to Allah as he murdered innocent people at an army base.
sheesh. he allegedly shouted allahu akbar, but the last i heard, this hasn't been confirmed. the fact that you believe this without confirmation only proves my point.
However, lately I'm not seeing violence from Christians. Are you?
you mean like this?
Post a Comment