tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6021181.post116914156756308270..comments2024-03-27T23:06:08.301-04:00Comments on stAllio!'s way: INtake takes on blogsstAllio!http://www.blogger.com/profile/15712626121566349866noreply@blogger.comBlogger2125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6021181.post-1169235269260479842007-01-19T14:34:00.000-05:002007-01-19T14:34:00.000-05:00the old article of which you speak is here (indysc...the old article of which you speak is <A HREF="http://www.intakeweekly.com/articles/3/022187-9213-160.html" REL="nofollow">here</A> (indyscribe bit is <A HREF="http://www.intakeweekly.com/articles/3/022214-7773-160.html" REL="nofollow">here</A>). be sure to check all the "related content".<BR/><BR/>i'd have to agree that overall, the piece is much longer and detailed, and more pro-blog. also, i haven't even heard of most of the blogs they discussed. i guess the landscape has changed significantly since march, 2005.stAllio!https://www.blogger.com/profile/15712626121566349866noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6021181.post-1169143259482932452007-01-18T13:00:00.000-05:002007-01-18T13:00:00.000-05:00A year or so ago, they did a similar article, only...A year or so ago, they did a similar article, only it was "Rah, rah blogs!" and they interviewed the IndyScribe team. What a difference a year makes.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.com